نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
In this article, the text of the televised debate between Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Mir Hossein Mousavi in the context of the tenth presidential election of the Islamic Republic of Iran (June 2009) has been studied using PDAM's discourse analysis model, which includes five levels: "surface level", "surface depth", "depth level", "deep" and "deeper".
Based on the results obtained, in this debate, Mousavi theorized the inefficiency of the ninth government and saw that Ahmadinejad's acceptance was lost as a result of his closed cultural policy. He called Ahmadinejad's policies extremist and had negative consequences. He also blamed the government's tyranny and lawlessness for contradicting the Imam's teachings and accused Ahmadinejad of projecting to regain power.
Ahmadinejad, while defending the government's performance and theorizing sabotage and destruction against the government, has criticized the performance of the war government of Mousavi and his supporters, as well as the political positions of Mousavi and his supporters, and theorized his and his supporters' lawlessness.
کلیدواژهها English
